November 2003

FIT AND HEALTHY

ONLINE HOME

Adult onset diabetes

Newsletter index

Contact and

Sign up

 

The Health and Fitness Express contains the random and organised thoughts of John Miller

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

I read recently that the increasing epidemic (or is it a pandemic) of adult onset diabetes in the well fed and under-exercised world is going to put even more pressure on government health budgets.

Of course that's only true if governments accept responsibility for it isn't it? I'm not sure they should, after all they're not the cause of it

It's like the continued braying about the need to pour more public money into the medical/pharmaceutical industry because the population is getting older. My own view of this is that we're being softened up to be taxed at ever increasing rates just because governments are kowtowing to an industry group, egged on by an increasingly unhealthy populace, that has a tight rein on the nation's heart strings. Governments have been bludgeoned into accepting responsibility for things that are not of their own doing or own choosing.

Of course it suits both the medical/pharmaceutical industry and individual consumers to put their hand out for a subsidy for poor health. Put your hand out for an reward for keeping yourself fit and healthy and you get it bitten off! In fact it's illegal in this country for medical insurance companies to give people a rebate on their health insurance because they at low risk of making a claim.

It's like the recent brouhaha about the sheep ship. If it had been widgets that had been knocked back by some company in Arabia we wouldn't have heard any more about it. In the mean time the Australian tax payer has to fork out another $20m of unbudgetted funds. That money could put a phys ed teacher into 400 Australian primary schools.

So what and who is behind the thinking that my poor health is some one else's responsibility - not even some-one who might be remotely responsible (like my mother, father, physical educator or doctor), but a collective of some-ones - the government acting on behalf of my fellow taxpayers?

Quite frankly I don't know, but the mood is such that the conventional wisdom about someone else paying for my own poor health choices is rolling out across the landscape like a tidal wave. The Commonwealth Parliament is currently debating bills worth between 500 and 1000 billion dollars, the numbers rolling across the tongue as though it were a mere $900 or $1000 we were talking about. That's 100,000 more phys ed teachers. That would really make an impact.

I feel that in the end expecting the government to pick up the tab for every visit to the doctor and every tablet will bankrupt the country. If it doesn't do that, siphoning money out of the pockets of taxpayers into the medical black hole will slowly choke off the funds that could either stay where they belong or be spent on great national productive enterprises that make us all richer

So what are the two major causes of adult onset diabetes? Answer, sloth and gluttony. Not very fashionable these days dredging up a couple of the seven deadly sins is it? And you can bet your last buck that not a lot of medical research is being channeled into this area.

During Diabetes Week you'll be encouraged to donate more money to diabetes research, 99% of which will be devoted to medical research that's focuses on the horse after it's bolted. If you want to throw your money away, at least earmark your donation to go toward that funding which is devoted to inspiring and motivating people to keep themselves in exceptionally good shape. On the other hand if you're desperately looking for somewhere to park your spare cash, keep me in mind. Then I can spend more of my time training and writing.

If you send me $10, I'll send you back a cute little diabetes risk factor assessment form, and after you've done the tests I'll give you an estimate of your risk of getting diabetes.

MASTERS AND DICKSON
While we're on the topic of health and aging, spare a thought for the tens of thousands of people who recently entered the Masters Games here in Canberra. It makes a mockery of the notion that age and poor health are intimately connected.

David Dickson, Rome Olympian and member of Fit and Healthy swam under 1.10 for 100 m freestyle in the 60 - 64 group. That's a very good swim, irregardless of age. His younger fellow Olympian, Shane Gould swam 1.04 in the 45 - 54 age group. And it gets better. In the men's 80 - 84 group, K. Vickery swam 1.28. That's unbelievable. It's health and fitness at it's best. And I noticed in the results that Tubby Ramsay swam 8.56 to come second in the 400m individual medley for men over 65. If you can beat that, report back.

I can tell you one thing, we don't need more medical research. In fact 80% of medical research is bunkum. The money just goes into sheltered workshops for the academically gifted. Most of it is spent on inventing better ways to patch people, up not providing them with incentive to keep themselves fit and healthy in the first place. Not many researchers would have been down at the AIS pool probing Mr Vickery's mind for the secrets of how to enter your dotage in great shape.

Have you ever thought how bizarre it is that the private sector of science is dedicated to inventing products and services which save us expending energy and fill our minds and bodies with junk and the other half has it's hand outstretched for public money to devise ways to clean up the mess created by the first group!

Save yourself the expense. Look after yourself. Keep yourself in good shape. Keep your hand in your pocket (unless you want to send me money).

All we need is the incentive to keep ourselves as fit as the tout that Mr Vickery must be. While the rest of his cohorts are booking themselves into nursing homes, this old bloke is churning through his laps. I bet he's as lean as a greyhound and toey as a Roman sandal to boot.

Mr Vickery's main prize though is good health. There are no prizes for poor health, only tablets. And we're not talking rocket science here. Percy Cerutty restored himself back to good health by starting a walking, running and swimming program and not eating anything cooked for three years. Imagine how healthy we'd all be if we did that?

So, don't ask what medical research can do for you, ask what you can do for yourself. We don't need more medical research to tell us how to live a healthy life. Percy's prescription of exercising like buggery and eating wisely is all we need.

If the public does want to subsidize something which would have a real bearing on community health it would be good personal and physical development programs. It's pointless trying to change the body without changing the mind - and vice versa.

If medical costs were going down I'd count medical research as a success. It's not. That's why just about every time you put your hand into your pocket for medical research you're being dudded. Spend you money on your own health research program. Work out for yourself what you need to do to keep yourself fit and healthy. Then do it.

And next time you go for a swim, time yourself for 100m. Regardless of your age or gender, if you can't beat Mr Vickery, train harder. If you can, report back. As a general rule, if the time you take to swim any distance is less than twice the time it takes for the world record holder, then you can count yourself as being in pretty good shape.

In the mean time stay tuned, highly tuned.


Regards


John Miller